06-25-2005, 12:13 AM
|
#1
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
so basically i want to do a custom exhaust by the end of the summer.....im going to do 2.5 in piping to the camaro dynomax super turbo muffler.........now since im doing larger piping im going to get a high-flow catalytic converter...probably a dynomax super converter b/c the price is right......this brings me to my 1st question, i can get a 2.5 in converter that's 13.25 inches long for 54 bucks....but they have a 18 inch long converter that's 120 bucks....what's the advantage to the longer converter, and is it worth a crap load of extra money (i doubt it personally)........my next question is that sometime in the future im planning on getting some pacesetter headers with ceramic coating, should i have any trouble fitting these in if i put on a custom exhaust?...i have an ecotec by the way
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 12:44 AM
|
#2
|
Aleromod part owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18,199
|
Mmmmm, you post an interseting question.
A cat is a cat, I'm sure you can find the size you want, you'll just have to shop around. I suggest Summit Racing to find the cat, but do the headers you want come with a cat?, If they do it will be easier to hook up custom exhaust.
__________________
33% ALEROMOD OWNER!!
2000 Olds Alero 3400 SFI 14.53 @ 94.93
1985 Olds Delta 88 307 SBO 17.96 @ 76.99
2007 Volvo V50 T5 6M 15.782 @ 89.12
www.facebook.com/kb0177
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 12:53 AM
|
#3
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
im pretty sure they do not come with a cat...........i've been told that the headers will hook up to the stock cat fine....so if the aftermarket cat is in the same place shouldnt it hook up fine too?
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 12:56 AM
|
#4
|
Aleromod part owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18,199
|
I would think so.
I suggest getting an O2 sim. off PFYC to keep that pesky SES light off
__________________
33% ALEROMOD OWNER!!
2000 Olds Alero 3400 SFI 14.53 @ 94.93
1985 Olds Delta 88 307 SBO 17.96 @ 76.99
2007 Volvo V50 T5 6M 15.782 @ 89.12
www.facebook.com/kb0177
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 12:59 AM
|
#5
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
where does the O2 sim fit into
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 07:01 AM
|
#6
|
|
Ignore the comment about the o2 simulator, because there is no o2 sim offered for our cars (by our cars, I mean us ecotec owners), and your only option is either A: set off a CEL due to an obdII incompatible cat, and not knowing when something that REALLY is throwing a CEL light is actually happenin, or B: getting an OBDII compliant/compatible Cat, and leaving the stock o2 sensors (both of them) in the exhaust in their appropriate places. ALSO, if you are planning on staying NA (naturally aspirated) I would recommend only steppin it up to 2.25 as you will be losing back pressure, and may suffer more losses than gains with the oversized exhaust. HOWEVER, if infact you will be increasing performance on the car, make sure that the mods planned, will warrant a 2.5" exhaust.
Cheers,
Landon
|
|
|
06-25-2005, 02:04 PM
|
#7
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
i hear alot of different things about backpressure however......there's alot on here who say that less backpressure will not kill you at all..helps infact..i cant remember who, but im searching for the post now
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 04:09 AM
|
#8
|
|
Well youre partially right, backpressure isnt what is important per say, but rather EGV (Exhaust Gas Velocity) but the two normally go hand in hand. However, unless you are runnin a turbo under the hood, you certainly do need EGV/Backpressure, in order to maintain a decent amount of "pull" all across your powerband. Go over on Jbody.org and see what the J body owners have found using 2.5" on their NA ecotecs for the best feedback.
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 02:54 PM
|
#9
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
aleroSS, i searched around a bit on jbody and i understand what you're talking about now..........so, if i go with 2.25 inch piping will my local exhaust shop be able to fit that to the super turbo muffler that has a 2.5 inch inlet?.....or, also, would i just be better off going with something like this exhaust ??
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 03:30 PM
|
#10
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alero_ecotec@Jun 26 2005, 12:54 PM
aleroSS, i searched around a bit on jbody and i understand what you're talking about now..........so, if i go with 2.25 inch piping will my local exhaust shop be able to fit that to the super turbo muffler that has a 2.5 inch inlet?.....or, also, would i just be better off going with something like this exhaust ??
|
Yes they will. But why don't you just go with 2.5-inch pipes? It has been dyno proven that you still get a bit better results with 2.5 over 2.25. Same set up I have 2.5-inch pipes from the catback with the superturbo muffler. Nice combo.
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 03:30 PM
|
#11
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
also, would it be ok to stick with the stock cat because when i looked up the price of a OBDII compliant flowmaster that had dual sensor hookups it was going to run me 200, and that's a crap load of money for just a converter.......and if i dont get an OBDII i will throw a code correct?
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 03:32 PM
|
#12
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
ahhh i knew there was a veteran on here who always said that 2.5 is better than 2.25....now i really dont know what to do
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-26-2005, 09:57 PM
|
#13
|
|
Im leery of these "dyno results" especially whether they pertain to the ecotec specifically. Certain cars, and certain motors respond differently to different sizes, so without seeing these dyno results Im gonna have to wave the BS flag until I see proof. Im not disputing the fact, I just need to see proof first. There are a number of variables that have to be factored into that statement before just accepting it as a fact. Such factors include header upgrade? crush bent or mandrel? choice of muffler? cat convertor? etc etc If you are going with a crush bent system, and its not one of the nicer benders, you will be able to get away with 2.5" however a lot of the newer/nicer benders barely crinkle the inside edges of the bend, and alow for flow results closer to the mandrel (but not an equal flow to mandrel)
Also, as I posted in another thread in here " GM actually supplies a rather good cat with their cars. The shame being that they only allow for a small inlet and outlet for gases to pass thru. If you find someone who can enlarge the openings, youd be saving yourself a nice pocketful of change, and be able to run the stock cat on a larger diameter exhaust with decent results."
They can flare out any piping to go from 2.25 to 2.5, and when it comes to fitting your muffler(s)
|
|
|
06-27-2005, 01:14 AM
|
#14
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
well......i dont know, on jbody they really have a strong stance on 2.25 being a better size if you're staying NA....and at this point in time, being that im a poor college student, im definately staying NA....my goal is eventually 200 hp NA, and from talking to some people on ecotecpower.org and talking a bit back and fourth with mantapart i've decided it can definately be done...but this wont happen untill i start taking loans for dental school, where i can just tack on an extra 5 grand a year for car money .....so what are the openings on the stock cat? 2.25 or smaller?
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
06-27-2005, 02:55 PM
|
#15
|
Special Agent
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 671
|
also, am i going to need a resinator, the guys over on j-body are using one.........
Quote:
getting an OBDII compliant/compatible Cat, and leaving the stock o2 sensors (both of them) in the exhaust in their appropriate places.
|
does that mean there are 2 o2 sensors in the cat.....or one in the cat and one somewhere else?
__________________
THE Ohio State University!
|
|
|
07-01-2005, 03:43 PM
|
#16
|
|
There is one 02 sensor in your exhaust manifold or just a lil downstream of it, the other is just after the cat convertor.
cheers
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.
|