03-28-2006, 11:44 PM
|
#1
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
I saw that pfyc carries an eradispeed set up for $1285. This kit includes two 12" drilled and slotted front 2-piece front rotors, two piston calipers, pads, stainless steel lines, and rear drilled and slotted rotors that are stock size which use the stock calipers. But I did some more looking and found that Auto Parts Warehouse carries a 12" conversion for the front and rear. It is more money but things would be uniform. Something like $880 for the front and $990 for the rear. I know that the rear breaks wont help performance much but it would be cool.
P.S. here is a pic of the rear setup.
__________________
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 11:50 PM
|
#2
|
[boosted 2.4L]
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 1,537
|
wow. very nice. very costly, too.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 11:52 PM
|
#3
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,445
|
you meant to put BRAKES right? anyways i would go with the first kit because most of the braking is done in the front and i don't think there is any reason to get bigger rotors for the rear. plus you will save money. but thats just me
__________________
DO WORK
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 11:55 PM
|
#4
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
No dought about it. I am going to go with a Baer set up but it will probably be the one from pfyc because of price. I will have to do more research. Right now I have RSM' rotors with less that 1,000 miles on them. I will be home from college like the second week of May if someone is interested.
__________________
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 12:02 AM
|
#5
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alerocar01@Mar 29 2006, 03:52 AM
you meant to put BRAKES right? anyways i would go with the first kit because most of the braking is done in the front and i don't think there is any reason to get bigger rotors for the rear. plus you will save money. but thats just me
|
I agree with that because it is something like 80 or 85% of the breaking is done in the front and I am not taking the ho to a rally race. Yes I meant BRAKES but when I find new parts I just get excited.
__________________
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 01:01 AM
|
#6
|
Owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 19,932
|
pm mfuller on baer questions
__________________
72 442 "THE BEAST", 99 Alero - OSV Replica w/ original OSV parts, HURST Dual/Gate Shifter
Beware of the BackStabber
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 02:25 AM
|
#7
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: lookin' at you in the rearview
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NoSweat83+Mar 28 2006, 10:02 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NoSweat83 @ Mar 28 2006, 10:02 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-alerocar01@Mar 29 2006, 03:52 AM
you meant to put BRAKES right? anyways i would go with the first kit because most of the braking is done in the front and i don't think there is any reason to get bigger rotors for the rear. plus you will save money. but thats just me
|
I agree with that because it is something like 80 or 85% of the breaking is done in the front and I am not taking the ho to a rally race. Yes I meant BRAKES but when I find new parts I just get excited.
[/b][/quote]
If you are not rally racing what is the point of putting on Big brakes at all?? Hey, its your $$
__________________
I'm on a boat.....
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 02:58 AM
|
#8
|
GLS member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: way up in ya
Posts: 2,195
|
well if u put bigger rims on your car u increase the rotating mass....... so it is a worth while investment to get bigger brakes if u have rims.
my car didnt stop nearly as well when i put my chrome 18's on compared to my stock 16's.
also im not sure if your aware but another company also makes big brake conversions for our cars................. http://www.ssbrakes.com/ ...... i believe silent has those
and i wouldnt bother with the rears cuse its not necessary....... jsut get some drilled and slotted rotors to match the front..... who cares about size for antoher $900
__________________
joelsoundxtreme: u faggot
sweetnlow: takes one to know one
joelsoundxtreme: you know it cupcake
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 03:37 AM
|
#9
|
GLS member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,505
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SweetNLow@Mar 29 2006, 01:58 AM
and i wouldnt bother with the rears cuse its not necessary....... jsut get some drilled and slotted rotors to match the front..... who cares about size for antoher $900
|
cause it visually looks better. lol. but ya, that's pretty much the only reason to upgrade the rear brakes. they're only like 20% of your braking or something like that.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 04:01 AM
|
#10
|
GLS member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: way up in ya
Posts: 2,195
|
Quote:
Originally posted by sound_xtreme+Mar 29 2006, 02:37 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(sound_xtreme @ Mar 29 2006, 02:37 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-SweetNLow@Mar 29 2006, 01:58 AM
and i wouldnt bother with the rears cuse its not necessary....... jsut get some drilled and slotted rotors to match the front..... who cares about size for antoher $900
|
cause it visually looks better. lol. but ya, that's pretty much the only reason to upgrade the rear brakes. they're only like 20% of your braking or something like that.
[/b][/quote]
ya dipshet we covered that it visually looks better........ and thye only account for 20% of braking power....... what would we do without u!?!?!
__________________
joelsoundxtreme: u faggot
sweetnlow: takes one to know one
joelsoundxtreme: you know it cupcake
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 08:19 AM
|
#11
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Latrobe, Pa
Posts: 1,713
|
wow, thats alot of money to spend on brakes...... its probably worth it though....show some pics steve when you get em in!
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 10:46 AM
|
#12
|
GX Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 85
|
Braking is more along the lines of 60/40 front-rear, 80/20 is a little steep and performance would be dramatically reduced with that setup
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 10:48 AM
|
#13
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Latrobe, Pa
Posts: 1,713
|
how would it be dramatically reduced????
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 11:01 AM
|
#14
|
GX Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 85
|
Bad choice of words on my part. I guess the way I see it is that the more all 4 brakes are working together, the more efficient they are going to be in stopping the car. With a more uniform distribution between the brakes, the front and back are going to slow down more or less at the same time, while at 80/20 distribution, the front of the car is going to slow down much faster than the back, causing the front end to dip, and the rear end to jump into the air..
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 11:18 AM
|
#15
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Latrobe, Pa
Posts: 1,713
|
alright i see where your going now.... thanks, makes much more sense to me, haha
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 02:52 PM
|
#16
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
Hey sweet did you get yiddishbdg Baer setup? He said that it was a night and difference between stock and his old setup. Thanks for the link to SSBC, their products look great. They have 12" and 13" front setups and a 12" rear set up. But I trust Baer and the main reason for this up grade besides being able to stop more efficiently is show.
__________________
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 03:00 PM
|
#17
|
GL Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Idaho Falls, Id.
Posts: 676
|
Nosweat, SSBC has a really good reputation. I would equate it similar to Royal Purple...as in it is a great product, just not as well known as 'Pennzoil'... Do some research on them and you'll see what I mean. They have been being featured more and more lately as well... Either way, set up should be sweet!!!
__________________
2004 Metallic Silver Mazda Rx-8
1.3l Renesis Rotary
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 03:10 PM
|
#18
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alero2k4@Mar 29 2006, 07:00 PM
Nosweat, SSBC has a really good reputation.Â;-) I would equate it similar to Royal Purple...as in it is a great product, just not as well known as 'Pennzoil'...Â;-) Do some research on them and you'll see what I mean.Â;-) They have been being featured more and more lately as well...Â;-) Either way, set up should be sweet!!!
|
I know that they make great products but the best bang for the buck is probably the Baer setup from PFYC. 2-piece front 12" rotors w/ 2 piston calipers, pads, lines and rear rotors (look a likes which are stock size). Being a college student I have to get the most of my money right now. Plus black is a color I am working along with in the engine bay and interior.
__________________
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 03:29 PM
|
#19
|
GLS member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: way up in ya
Posts: 2,195
|
ya im getting yiddishes baer setup nosweat.
but honestly id prolly get teh ssbc is i wasnt pickin up the used baer set.
__________________
joelsoundxtreme: u faggot
sweetnlow: takes one to know one
joelsoundxtreme: you know it cupcake
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 03:38 PM
|
#20
|
I Have ONE NUT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Mankato, MN
Posts: 1,017
|
How much of a difference can I expect from either of these kits over my RSM slotted rotors and does anyone know someone who would want my RSM rotors? They have less that a 1,000 miles on them?
__________________
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.
|