07-19-2004, 01:27 PM
|
#1
|
GX Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Joisey
Posts: 39
|
Well, my baby, a loaded ruby red '03 GL1 w/ Ectotec/auto, got treaked in the nose by a clown posing as an 18 year old male driver. Took off everything forward of the radiator. Thank goodness all were OK and the Alero is repairable.
I got an '04 Malibu w/ 700 miles on it as a rental car while the Alero is being repaired. Engine is an Ecotec rated at 145 HP @5600 RPM w/ 155 ft-lbs torque at 4000 RPM. I ASSUME the extra 5 HP is due to straighter plumbing in the roomier Malibu.
All I wanna say is that the Malibu, while a lager car, feels a hell of a lot lighter, and the acceleration AND gas milage are, in my mind, a lot better- By comparison, my Alero feels like a slug and gets a consistant measely 21.5 mpg in suburban driving. This is consistant w/ the MPGs see in:
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/new/rev...ex.cfm/id/23309
I'm willing to guess the MPGs on the Malibu were in the high 20s, easy. And as I said, feels a lot faster to boot.
Curb weight Malibu around-3174
Curb weight GL1 Alero 4 door-3021
Alero Tranny- 4T40-E
Malibu Tranny- 4T45-E
All I can say is what the hell?...Wish I had the equipment know how to swap the drivetrains, but the Malibu setup probably would not fit in the Alero...damn...
Any comments or similar experiences welcome.
__________________
'03 Ruby Red GL1 4 Dr, Ecotec auto. All options but leather. 16 inch factory Argent wheel upgrade, Potenza RE910s, Powerslot front rotors, factory deleted cargo net replaced. Hi/lo beam Silverstars.
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 01:36 PM
|
#2
|
|
The '04 malibu's use the new Epsilon platform, and is supposed to be quite good. It's actually heavier than your car, but likely due to improved suspension geometry and steering, and probably a better damped suspension, it "feels" more nimble.
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 01:57 PM
|
#3
|
|
The gas milage is estimated at 34 highway & 24 city, which is roughly the same estimation for the Alero (both manual and automatic). Although, these are just estimates.
As for the tranny, a brief look at both shows little difference. However, I am not sure yet about a swap.
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 02:02 PM
|
#4
|
|
It's the platform and the new trans cal. The Maxx is even better, as it has a longer wheel base and the cal is the same at the Grand Am GT
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 09:14 PM
|
#5
|
|
The eco tech aleros' and GA's have 3.91 overall final drives, while the Malibu (eco) has a 3.63 overall final drive, that is why fuel econo is better in mali.
As far as performance, the malibu with the eco tech is louder inside, that can lead one to believe it is quicker.
|
|
|
07-21-2004, 10:46 AM
|
#6
|
GX Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Joisey
Posts: 39
|
Thanks for your thoughts guys. I think tranny guru's comment on the final drive is noteworthy. The Ectotec Alero EPA MPGs are 24/33 and I NEVER see those numbers- I'm WAY below.
I't would be interesting to do timed 0-60 runs on these cars- I think it's more than perception.
The Malibu does have more sound coming into the cabin, but I would like to think I'm savvy enuff to ignore that, and focus on how fast am I actully moving from A to B.
My guess is we are looking at a combo of final drive ratios, better breathing, and perhaps tranny shift calibrations that move the Malibu faster throughout the RPM range. I noticed the air box placement on the Malibu is on the passenger side, somewhat in front of and to the side of the engine and the box was quite large- there was a lot of room forward of the engine that does not exist in the Alero.
The bottom line that concerns us is Alero applications of all this, and my guess is that it would be prohibitively expensive, involving either bucks or in depth DIY tranny work experience.
__________________
'03 Ruby Red GL1 4 Dr, Ecotec auto. All options but leather. 16 inch factory Argent wheel upgrade, Potenza RE910s, Powerslot front rotors, factory deleted cargo net replaced. Hi/lo beam Silverstars.
|
|
|
07-21-2004, 12:06 PM
|
#7
|
GLS member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB, Canadnadnadanada
Posts: 2,528
|
Quote:
Originally posted by overdrive75@Jul 19 2004, 07:14 PM
The eco tech aleros' and GA's have 3.91 overall final drives, while the Malibu (eco) has a 3.63 overall final drive, that is why fuel econo is better in mali.
As far as performance, the malibu with the eco tech is louder inside, that can lead one to believe it is quicker.
|
You think the guy that works for GM could spell ECOTEC :rolleyes:
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockAlero00 @ Jul 1 2005, 11:15 PM
If I did went to college...
|
|
|
|
07-21-2004, 01:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
Do you know any automotive engineers with good spelling skills? I sure as hell haven't met one yet.
|
|
|
07-21-2004, 02:50 PM
|
#9
|
|
A lot of people spell ECOTEC wrong, slalomking even spelt it ectotech B)
Anyways, I find it interesting that a 4 banger was offered at all. I thought that V6's dominated this section of the market.
|
|
|
07-22-2004, 07:31 AM
|
#10
|
|
^^ Low cost option for the vehicle.
|
|
|
07-22-2004, 09:37 AM
|
#11
|
GX Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Joisey
Posts: 39
|
ECOTEC ECOTEC ECOTEC. Now that I've spelled it correctly...
Did a measured MPG run on the Malibu- included was a mix of hi speed hiway driving, a traffic jam of a half hour, local road suburban driving, all over 294.3 miles. I flogged the car "A LOT" (it's a rental..)
Trip computer gave an MPG of 24.5. Actual was 24.0 I'm impressed w/ the computer and the MPGs. If I drove it like the Alero (w/ care) I probably would be in the hi 20s.
__________________
'03 Ruby Red GL1 4 Dr, Ecotec auto. All options but leather. 16 inch factory Argent wheel upgrade, Potenza RE910s, Powerslot front rotors, factory deleted cargo net replaced. Hi/lo beam Silverstars.
|
|
|
07-23-2004, 08:52 PM
|
#12
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,892
|
WE have the Ecotec MAlibu's as rentals where I work. They do feel way lighter, but it is just a feeling from the stiff platform and super over boosted steering. I bet the alero would eat it in the 1/4 Mile.
__________________
2010 WRX 265 - AWD Boost
2004 RX-8 GT - Gone
2006 Cobalt SS 2.4L VVT - 15.05 @ 94.91 - Gone
1996 Camaro Y87 - Gone
2003 Alero 2.2L GX 5-Spd - 15.21 @ 88.21 - Gone
|
|
|
07-24-2004, 02:28 AM
|
#13
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by overdrive75@Jul 22 2004, 06:31 AM
^^ Low cost option for the vehicle.
|
It makes sense but I wonder if it's cost efficient. I always assumed that V6's dominated this market and introducing any 4 banger's would lose more money in the long run than gain. But then it's the Ecotec
|
|
|
07-24-2004, 03:02 PM
|
#14
|
GLS member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: .
Posts: 5,194
|
i just like the alero better... dont like the way the 'bu looks
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 03:11 PM
|
#16
|
|
my buddy has a malibu ecotec'ed out. The different platform is much nicer thant hte alero. and the steering is boosted a lot....
as far as MPG i get about 24-26 city/hiway mix. and about 34-35 when crusiing on the hiway around 60 or 65mph.
if i drive the lero hard i can get it as low as 22. never gotten it lower than that.. never really tried tho
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:37 PM
|
#17
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bedford, VA
Posts: 654
|
I have an Ecotec Alero and mine gets pretty good MPG's. I get like 25 city and 34 Hwy. Once on a trip to the beach, I got 37 MPG. It also does not feel like a slug either. Its beats the crap out of most 4cyl cars I have driven. I think you may have a sensor problem or something for your fuel milage to be that low.
__________________
2005 Honda CR-V AWD
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 06:46 PM
|
#18
|
|
Yeah my ecotec 5 spd alero makes 40 pretty constant on the HWY and well i've never made less than 27 but I always have some HWY km's on every tank.
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 01:20 PM
|
#19
|
GX Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Joisey
Posts: 39
|
I think BRsexton may be right...I have long had a nagging feeling for some time that something was wrong right from delivery of the car as new.
Talked w/ the local Olds Service desk...typical replies were....'engine not broken in yet....winter oxygenated fuel....may take up to 10K to get engine broken in well"...blah blah....
Why do the Alero rentals I use with similar mileage (9,000) go faster and get better MPGs then?.....
I gotta figure out a way to get these guys at the dealership to listen to me and starty poking around a little.
Thanks all for your input.. Yes, the Alero's looks (in and out) rule over the dowdy Malibu, but damn my luck to get one saddled with a problem that I am now convinced (after hearing from you guys) really exists.
__________________
'03 Ruby Red GL1 4 Dr, Ecotec auto. All options but leather. 16 inch factory Argent wheel upgrade, Potenza RE910s, Powerslot front rotors, factory deleted cargo net replaced. Hi/lo beam Silverstars.
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 01:23 PM
|
#20
|
|
Good luck with the dealership, I guess I should consider myself lucky since the owner at my dealership is a family friend. Maybe I can ask around for some information as well.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.
|